The SOCIAL in ESG, finally underwritten.

SOCIAL IMPACT INVESTMENT PROGRAMME (SiiP)

Edenwell designs, deploys and independently verifies investor-grade Social Impact Investment Programmes for living-sector real estate – embedded into the underwriting.

WHY SIIP

Environmental ESG has GRESB. Social ESG has had nothing equivalent ... until now.

EPC ratings, BREEAM, GRESB — the Environmental pillar of ESG has decades of standardised, third-party-verified metrics behind it. The Social pillar has never had an equivalent: a structured, priced, deliverable menu of programmes that developers, operators and funders can commission with the same confidence they commission a green loan framework. Edenwell built one.

Built for the Living sector

Coliving & PBSA Operators

Impact-Driven Real Estate Investors

Universities & Institutions

Affordable & Workforce Housing Developers

BTR & Senior Living Owners

Programme Overview

5 Impact programme clusters.
22 Impact deliverables.
1 underwriting language.

Every programme can be commissioned standalone, bundled, or layered into a full Social Impact Programme underwritten via FLOURISH Score & FLOURISH Underwrite. Full scope, deliverables and a tailored proposal are available on request.

CLUSTER A

Economic Empowerment & Livelihoods

Apprenticeship pipelines, local procurement, micro-business incubation and financial literacy — turning construction and operations spend into local careers and durable resident income.

CLUSTER B

Health, Wellbeing & Belonging

WEMWBS-measured wellbeing programming, community belonging strategy and the Flourishing Index™ diagnostic — the difference between an occupied unit and a resident who actually stays.

CLUSTER C

Equity, Safety & Inclusion

Anti-displacement covenants, gender safety & CPTED audits, accessibility design and resident governance — protecting the community a scheme sits within, not just the asset itself.

CLUSTER D

Future-Ready Communities

Digital inclusion, green skills training, youth mentoring and cultural heritage placemaking — the programmes that keep an asset relevant for the next decade, not just the next lease-up.

CLUSTER E

Measurement & Proof

Independent SROI reporting and the FLOURISH Score™ diagnostic & certification — the rating agency the Social side of ESG has never had, delivered in GRESB-ready format.

CLUSTER E · MEASUREMENT & PROOF

#FLOURISHbyEdenwell

The FLOURISH Impact Index

the rating agency the Social side of ESG has never had.

Environmental ESG has GRESB. Now Social ESG has FLOURISH — a composite 0–100 score built from a structured diagnostic across five weighted pillars, benchmarked against Edenwell’s own cross-portfolio index, and delivered with an independently verifiable rating tier: Seed, Bloom, Thrive, Flourish.

Every asset is scored against its own live diagnostic — the score alongside is illustrative.

SIIP IN ACTION

Take a SiiP (Impact Case Study)
Commerce Park, St. Petersburg, FL

A 3.03-acre, nineteen-parcel mixed-use redevelopment in the historic Deuces Corridor. Edenwell designed five integrated SIIP programmes for the scheme — each with a defined budget, quantifiable KPIs, and a proposed direct financial return to the asset.

FROM THE COMMERCE PARK RFP

Impact starts with leadership

“

Commerce Park is Edenwell in its purest form: a hospitality and housing development where community outcomes and financial performance aren’t competing priorities — they’re the same underwriting. This is what happens when impact is engineered in from day one, not retrofitted for a report.

Josef Reisz

CEO & Partner, Edenwell Capital Partners

“

Real estate has spent a decade treating social impact as a box to check and forget. We built the Social Impact Investment Programme to end that. Every initiative carries a budget, a measurable KPI, a financial return, and independent third-party verification — no exceptions.

Jenniffer Gearheart-Tang

Chief Innovation & Impact Officer, Edenwell

THE RESEARCH CASE

Independent evidence for NOI uplift

Edenwell’s SIIP methodology is supported by the two most rigorous studies available on resident services in affordable and multifamily housing: a 248-property, quasi-experimental study from Abt Global, and 2022–2025 member data from Stewards of Affordable Housing for the Future (SAHF), a 13-member national collaborative operating 160,000+ affordable rental homes.

+26%

higher Net Operating Income for service-enriched properties in the following year — roughly $1,200 in additional NOI per unit — vs. otherwise-similar properties without resident services.

−24%

lower rent arrears rates, at both the $100 and $500 thresholds, in properties with resident services compared with properties without.

1.2 vs 7.3

eviction-related moveouts per 100 households in SAHF properties with resident services, vs. the national average eviction filing rate over the same period.

5% vs 1%

labor force participation growth (2023–2024) among residents with access to employment & financial services, vs. residents without.

Sources: The Impact of Resident Services on Property Financial Performance, Abt Global, commissioned by SAHF (January 2026) · The Case for Resident Services, Stewards of Affordable Housing for the Future (sahfnet.org).

QUESTIONS

Frequently asked questions

Accordion #1

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Accordion #2